On Dec 15, 9:40 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote: > >> Hold it. If there's a habtm relationship between Person and Address, > >> then Addresses shouldn't even have a person_id. OTOH, if there isn't a > >> habtm relationship, then the << operation is unnecessary (and I think > >> it's a syntax error). > > >> So...which is it? > > > In his original example Address has a person_id field so I was > > assuming a has_many relationship, not a HABTM. > > Which means << is invalid, doesn't it?
Perhaps I'm not understanding what you mean when you say invalid? Do you mean that it will generate an exception, or that it isn't a good way to solve the problem? \Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
