Peter Vandenabeele wrote in post #970618: > Colin Law wrote in post #970616: >> On 25 December 2010 00:37, Peter Vandenabeele <li...@ruby-forum.com> >> wrote: > ... >>> I am not in favor of D because it silently changes the class >>> of the result and this violates the principle of least surprise. >>> If you want Rational, use it from the start then. >> >> For D there is no reason why the class of the result needs to change >> to Rational. It could stay as BigDecimal but internally store the >> data as a Rational.
In this case there would be no advantage to storing as a Rational. Sounds like you want an ExactNumber class that abstracts both. For the record, I think BigDecimal / BigDecimal = BigDecimal is the correct design. > > Ah, I see. I had not thought it that way. > > Thanks, > > Peter Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org Sent from my iPhone -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
