Hi, a collection routes is meant to work on the whole collection. Example for a collection delete would be for example to delete all books that are out of print. If you want to delete a particular book the member route is perfect....how would you otherwise know in your controller, which book to delete?
Markus -- http://www.communityguides.eu On Sunday, March 20, 2011 5:05:19 PM UTC+1, Ruby-Forum.com User wrote: > > Hi, > > Using "resources :object" in my routes file, the DELETE operation > operates by default on an individual member (i.e. it requires an 'id' to > be specified). > > I'd like to change this so that DELETE is a collection route, so that I > can call it without having to specify an id and still have the route > match through to the destroy method. > > I'm new to Rails routes, so any help would be much appreciated! > > Thanks, > > - Nex > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.