Thank you.
I'll keep it like this for now :)
Anyone else has any thoughts in this matter?
Best Regards
Linus
On 21 mar, 16:57, David J. Hamilton <gro...@hjdivad.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Linus Pettersson's message of Mon Mar 21 08:37:33 -0700 2011:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi and thank you for your reply!
>
> > It kinda works... There is some issues though.
>
> > When I go to .../ackord/artist-name I want to load the artists show
> > action and inside this I loop out all the songs that's related to the
> > artist.
>
> > When I go to this url now it load the songs index action instead. Its
> > because I have these two in my routes
>
> > artist_songs GET /ackord/:artist_id(.:format)
> > {:action=>"index", :controller=>"songs"}
> > and
> > artist GET /ackord/:id(.:format)
> > {:action=>"show", :controller=>"artists"}
>
> > Perhaps this is actually better and instead of showing the songs
> > inside artist#show I filter the songs and show them in songs#index
> > instead.
>
> Personally I think it's fine for this logic to live in the songs controller,
> especially given that you've effectively namespaced the songs (by artist) by
> making it a nested resource.
>
> That said, there is a bit of an ugliness in the route collision, especially
> since rails presumably doesn't guarantee the how the collision is resolved.
>
> OTOH there's a lot of ugliness in having to specify each route manually.
> Unless
> someone else on the list has a better suggestion than the one I offered, you
> may
> have to simply pick your poison.
>
> --
> med vänlig hälsning
> David J. Hamilton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
