On Apr 7, 6:25 pm, Harry Svensson <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote: > (in routes.rb) > > map.connect 'A', :controller => 'B', :action => 'C' > > I am not the king of the djungle - but I did find this information on > the web and I suppose that I make a function in controller called "B" > and then on page A where the form is I have "action='C'" so they are > connected - but this is just pure speculations because I have no idea > what so ever. this is pure guesses - can anyone please tell me if I'm > correct or anything at all? >
That means that a http request to http://yourserver/A should be routed to the action called C (ie a method called C) in the controller called B. Your form action would be /A (since form actions are urls or paths. There are some intricacies in routing, but in a nutshell it is the process of decided which controller should handle an incoming web request I have to say that the approach you've got seems a little far fetched - Why display the comments one by one in this fashion rather than have them all on page to begin with? You might want to take a look at the getting started guide at http://guides.rubyonrails.org/getting_started.html - it covers created a basic blog post & comments app Fred Fred Fred > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
