Disclaimer: I really like the unix model of building products. The objection I've heard is specifically for - gems that depends on native packages in the repository - ruby, rvm and ruby that is already in the native package manager The idea expressed was that dependencies are already explicitly defined by the native package manager, and that this is the clean way of resolving these dependencies. Another objection to installing your own version was that this bypasses the standard way for distributions to deploy security and bug-fixes.
>From experience I think this view falls short because most dependencies are resolved by just calling bundler, and for those that are not you can just update your README with the proper information. best, Andy are part of the package repository On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:44 PM, UNIXgod <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Andreas Saebjoernsen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > The native package manager generally has very outdated ruby and rvm > > versions. > > I know this hurts unix purists, but it's your time and using > rvm/gem/rails > > like most other people do will save you a lot of time. > > rvm is a user sandbox. why would that hurt a purist? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
