On Sep 22, 10:31 am, Norbert Melzer <timmel...@googlemail.com> wrote: > He said, that he was using the Ruby installer, so there is no rvm. Also I > don't remember rvm is running with windows. > > Anyway, it looks as if there is some version mismatch when I look at the > pathes. 1.9.2 is mentioned on the one side, but in the path the gems go > into a 1.9.1 dir. >
That was nothing to do, see 1.9.2 release FAQ: http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2010/08/18/ruby-1-9.2-released/ "Standard library is installed in /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1 This version is a "library compatible version." Ruby 1.9.2 is almost 1.9.1 compatible, so the library is installed in the 1.9.1 directory." Please see the link I sent before about checking the "gem env" information to determine if some drive or directory do not exist. -- Luis Lavena -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
