Before you go any further is that 99 read and 1 write per second or 1 read and 99 writes. Writes are expensive and reads can be cached. Some idea as to the reads to writes ratio would be useful if anyone is going to give you any advise.
On 9 October 2011 14:27, KevinC <kevinch...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi- > > I have a requirement for a system that does 10M+ read/writes a day. I > haven't done work with this volume before. It translates to 100+ read/ > writes per second. Can anyone recommend a rails DB back end for a > system of this volume? Can I get performance like this with mysql > clusters? What else should I be looking at? > > Thanks for any advice, > Kevin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
