On 3/12/11 20:04, "Colin Law" <[email protected]> wrote:
> In addition I would seriously question the use of 2.3 versus 3.1. 2.3
> is only receiving security fixes now I believe (not bug fixes) and it
> is not trivial to update an app from 2.3 to 3. If the app is expected
> to have a significant life then using 2.3 just because the server is
> currently geared up for that is surely a questionable decision.
I have mentioned to the party involved that getting the web hosting people
to upgrade is a very good idea partly because I'm just cutting my teeth on
rails & all the work I've done so far has been on v.3 & I also thought that
the hosting company will get a memo from HQ saying all the servers are
getting an upgrade & it'll leave me, as you said, upgrading a live site.
I think I'll be more adamant with the client about this & explain as well as
I can the circumstances to her. Unfortunately, she's not at all
computer-minded shall we say...
Cheers,
Phil.
--
Nothing to see here... move along, move along
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
