Yes none of that is relevant any more.

Mark
Edson Tirelli wrote:

    James,

    I believe this was related to Drools 2.
    What exactly is your problem?

    []s
    Edson

2009/8/14 James Owen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    Greetings:

    Just wondering if this link still applies.  If so, I think I may
    have found an answer to one of my benchmark problems.

    http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DROOLS/Rete+Vs+Reteoo

    SDG
    James Owen
    Founder October Rules Fest
    Senior Consultant / Architect KBSC
    http://www.kbsc.com
    http://www.OctoberRulesFest.org
    Twitter: OctRulesFest
    Blogs:
    http://JavaRules.blogspot.com [Rulebased Systems Blog]
    http://ORF2009.blogspot.com [October Rules Fest Blog]
    http://exscg.blogspot.com/ [Expert Systems Consulting Group Blog]

    /"If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the
    shoulders of giants."/
    *Sir Isaac Newton in a letter to Robert Hooke, 5 Feb 1676*
    *
    *
    *Come to October Rules Fest and stand on the shoulders of the
    Giants of the industry; if only for a week.*



    On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:21 AM, [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Depending on your number of rules and facts, that amount of memory will likely be a concern. If I had memory requirements like that I would honestly look a clips.

    -Michael

    On Aug 13, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Thomas Frenken
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hello,

I am interested in running Drools 5 (and especially Drools Fusion) on a
    somehow<< resource-constrained device for which only a J2SE
1.4 VM ist
    available.

    Since Drools meanwhile requires J2SE 1.5 I thought about
backporting it.
    But before I invest so much effort, I got two questions:

1) I have downloaded the sourcecode. At a first glance the only reason for
    requiering J2SE 1.5 is the extensive use of generics. In case I
    would
remove all generics from the code, would it be possible to compile drools
    for a J2SE 1.4 VM runtime in general or are there other more hidden
    reasons for requiering J2SE 1.5?
    2)  I already meantioned I am planning to run drools on a
    >>somehow<<
    resourcen-constrained device. I explicitly used the term >>somehow<<
because I am talking of a device with a 400 Mhz CPU and 256 MB RAM (some
    people might laugh about calling this resource-constrained). How
    about
    resource-consumption of drools? Has anyone run drools on a
    device with
    similar resources?

    Thanks in advance!

    Best Regards
    Thomas Frenken

    _______________________________________________
    rules-dev mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
    _______________________________________________
    rules-dev mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev


    _______________________________________________
    rules-dev mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev




--
 Edson Tirelli
 JBoss Drools Core Development
 JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com <http://www.jboss.com>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Reply via email to