+1 for OWL On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Michael Neale <[email protected]>wrote:
> Interesting - well I think there is interest in OWL, maybe RIF and > RuleML is still around, but the others - I haven't heard much? > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Xavier Breton <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm looking for feedback, I'll develop a Semantic Web Drools Module that > > will be the subject of my Master Degree Tesis. > > > > The idea is to use Eclipse Modelling Framework (EMF) for prototyping and > > follow a Model Driven Architecture (MDA) where the source language is > > Semantic of Business Vocabularies and Business Rules (SBVR) and the > target > > language is Drools DRL. > > > > The mapping could be (PIM level): > > - Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) > > - Ontology Web Language (OWL) > > - RuleML > > - Rule Interchange Format (RIF) > > - REWERSE Rule Markup Language (R2ML) > > > > It could be added to the module at the source UML or Entity Relationship > > like models to transform the models into SBVR. > > > > Regards > > > > Xavier Breton > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > > > > > -- > Michael D Neale > home: www.michaelneale.net > blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- - http://salaboy.wordpress.com - http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
