Yes you are naughty ;-) But it does lead me to question whether DRL and DSL can be unicode encoded (so DSL at least) can be localised language (U+007F is the end of Basic Latin/ASCII). Do you know the answer in your delvings?
On 21 October 2010 20:25, Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, yes, I'm naughty. I've implemented a parameterized evaluator, using > Unicode codepoint > U+2282<http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2282/index.htm>as a > parameter. > > But the DRL parser refuses to accept this (as part of square_chunk_data): > Line 60:59 no viable alternative at input '' > which indicates that the character isn't recognized at all. > > I think this happens because, outside of strings, codepoints beyond U+007F > aren't accepted anywhere except > those explicitly specified as IdentifierStart and IdentifierPart. Perhaps > square_chunk_data after an operator > identifier could be made to behave more like a string. > > Admittedly, this is esoteric, but it sure does look dazzling ;-) > > Cheers > -W > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
