I must be missing something then ? I'll update. Sorry for the noise. On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:59, Salaboy <[email protected]> wrote:
> By the way I've already remove that class in the trunk. > > - CTO @ <http://www.plugtree.com>http://www.plugtree.com > - MyJourney @ <http://salaboy.wordpress.com>http://salaboy.wordpress.com > - Co-Founder @ <http://www.jbug.com.ar>http://www.jbug.com.ar > - Mauricio "Salaboy" Salatino - > > On 22/10/2010, at 03:49, Antoine Toulme <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK! > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 21:04, Mark Proctor < <[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 22/10/2010 05:47, Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I thought Drools was standardizing over slf4j. Is there a reason why a >> java.util.logging.Logger class is used ? >> >> Here is some of the code: >> >> Logger.getLogger(JPAVariablePersister.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, >> null, t); >> >> Should slf4j be used instead ? Note it's used by JtaTransactionManager and >> SingleSessionCommandService in the same project. >> >> Just missed code, feel free to replace. >> >> Mark >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Antoine >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list <[email protected]>[email protected] >> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> <[email protected]>[email protected] >> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
