After my change ide-commons will depend on verifier. Toni
On Feb 7, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote: > factconstraints (at least the GUI/GWT part) should be moved into > ide-common I believe. > If verifier no longer depends on ide-common, that should be possible to > move. > > verfier does have any GUI/GWT code (or build therefor). > > Op 07-02-11 13:38, Esteban Aliverti schreef: >> >> And what about factconstraint? It should be possible to move it to >> drools-verifier? >> >> Best regards, >> >>> El feb 7, 2011 5:53 a.m., "Toni Rikkola" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió: >>> >>> It should be possible to keep drools-verifier in the drools repo. >>> Doing some changes to support this right now. >>> >>> Toni >>> >>> >>> On Feb 6, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote: >>> >>>> After the split-up drools-verifier is suppo... >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > -- > With kind regards, > Geoffrey De Smet > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
