On 19 September 2011 17:57, Mauricio Salatino <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Jiri, > Drools Verifier do that for you? Am I right? > I think this is a misunderstanding. Looking at Drools' Java code takes a Java bug finding program such as findbugs. What Drools Verifier does is: look at DRL code written by Drools users. Findbugs applied to Drools code is a good idea, but I would opt for this to include fundamental code that's *used *by Drools and responsible for a considerable number of JIRAs. -W > Toni Rikkola is the man behind drools verifier, you can talk with him to > improve what he has now. I know that Esteban was also playing with that and > adding the concept of Working Set. You can talk with him as well. > Cheers > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ansgar Konermann < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> If I'm eligible to vote, please go for option 1. >> Am 19.09.2011 17:14 schrieb "Jiri Svitak" <[email protected]>: >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> > > > -- > - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com > - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com > - Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org > - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar > > - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio - > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
