Very well written. Thank you. Whether there's the need for a Drools-prvided library (beyond the things there are now as accumulate functions) remains to be seen.
I still maintain the notion that it should be possible to obtain quantifier results and continue LHS evaluation, and I think that the functional approach would make this easier. It can be done now, using a dedicated accumulate function, but there's the issue of escaping from the iteration when the final result is established. -W On 19 October 2011 22:59, Mario Fusco <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > as anticipated by Mark, I put down some ideas on how we could start > introducing some functional programming features in the DRL. > > http://community.jboss.org/wiki/FunctionalProgrammingInDrools > > It's needless to say that the document has to been considered just a draft > in its very first stage and any feedback or suggestion to improve or clarify > it is welcome. > > Mario > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
