Hey Guys,

Could the strict mode changes be causing the issues with generic Sets that I'm 
seeing in 5.3.0.Final (cf. Rules-list)? Anyway to modify strict mode in a java 
context?

best wishes,

Andrew

On Oct 28, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Mark Proctor wrote:

> Is the rule using the MVEL or the Java dialect? MVEL does not yet support 
> generic's notation.
> 
> Mark
> On 28/10/2011 05:36, Michael Anstis wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> With Drools-5.4.0-SNAPSHOT, MVEL2-2.1.0.drools4 the following compiles OK:-
>> 
>>     org.drools.runtime.process.WorkItemManager wim = 
>> drools.getWorkingMemory().getWorkItemManager();
>>     org.drools.SessionConfiguration sessionConfiguration = 
>> (org.drools.SessionConfiguration) 
>> kcontext.getKnowledgeRuntime().getSessionConfiguration();
>>     java.util.Map handlers = sessionConfiguration.getWorkItemHandlers();
>> 
>> However moving the last Map to generics (as you'd expect is needed for 
>> strict mode) does not:-
>> 
>>     org.drools.runtime.process.WorkItemManager wim = 
>> drools.getWorkingMemory().getWorkItemManager();
>>     org.drools.SessionConfiguration sessionConfiguration = 
>> (org.drools.SessionConfiguration) 
>> kcontext.getKnowledgeRuntime().getSessionConfiguration();
>>     java.util.Map<java.lang.String, 
>> org.drools.runtime.process.WorkItemHandler> handlers = 
>> sessionConfiguration.getWorkItemHandlers();
>> 
>> Unable to Analyse Expression org.drools.runtime.process.WorkItemManager wim 
>> = drools.getWorkingMemory().getWorkItemManager(); 
>> org.drools.SessionConfiguration sessionConfiguration = 
>> (org.drools.SessionConfiguration) 
>> kcontext.getKnowledgeRuntime().getSessionConfiguration(); 
>> java.util.Map<java.lang.String, org.drools.runtime.process.WorkItemHandler> 
>> handlers = sessionConfiguration.getWorkItemHandlers();: [Error: unable to 
>> resolve method using strict-mode: org.drools.spi.KnowledgeHelper.,()] [Near 
>> : {... Map<java.lang.String, org.drools.runtime.process.W ....}] ^ [Line: 3, 
>> Column: 32]
>> 
>> Can anybody explain?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Reply via email to