On 14 Feb 2013, at 14:18, Esteban Aliverti <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since the time we started using github I've always preferred the pull-request > mechanism instead of the direct commit. Having said that, having commit > permissions is sometimes helpful and that is why I would like to remain in > the commiters list: "just in case". That sounds like a plan, we can always add people back in, if they start committing regularly again. Mark > > P.S: It's hard to get rid of the old SVN paradigms :). > > Best Regards, > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > Esteban Aliverti > - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Geoffrey De Smet <[email protected]> > wrote: > Of course :) > > Not removing laune and nheron either. > > Op 14-02-13 14:51, Wolfgang Laun schreef: > > If the proposed "remove" wouldn't let me do quick fixes like today's - > > as you proposed - then you might want to let me keep this right, at > > your discretion ;-) > > > > -W > > > > On 14/02/2013, Geoffrey De Smet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> Stemming from the SVN era, a lot of community contributers still have > >> full commit rights on the blessed repositories. > >> Because GitHub offers the "pull request" paradigm, > >> the lack of commit rights are far less intrusive than in SVN. > >> > >> Many community contributors seem to prefer contributing changes through > >> pull request paradigm, > >> as it forces a core developer to sign off on the changes. > >> Having direct commit rights can even be counter-intuitive: > >> for example, if you edit a file directly on github, it doesn't create a > >> pull request, but applies the changes directly. > >> Commits from contributors that come in via pull requests are still > >> attributed to the original author > >> and count towards the original author's stats, so there are no > >> additional disadvantages. > >> > >> Following that logic, I propose to *remove the commit rights on blessed > >> for these contributors* in 72 hours: > >> Please note that we appreciate past and future commits. Please keep the > >> contributions coming! :) > >> > >> bauna > >> bbrodt > >> dennyxu > >> dgutierr > >> diega > >> jcoleman0redhat0com > >> jrenaat > >> jsvitak > >> JuanmaGonzalez > >> KurtStam > >> laune > >> lazarotti > >> leogomes > >> lucazamador > >> michaelneale > >> michiBK > >> mswiderski > >> nheron > >> nickboldt > >> nmirasch > >> pefernan > >> RickJWagner > >> ryanzhang > >> saifulomar > >> tkobayas > >> trefor > >> wmedvede > >> yurloc > >> > >> If you're on this list and want to keep your commits rights on blessed, > >> just reply to this mail and I 'll take you off the list. No long > >> argumentation needed :) > >> > >> *Keep commits rights on the blessed repositories* > >> > >> etirelli > >> ge0ffrey > >> jervisliu > >> krisv > >> manstis > >> mariofusco > >> mdproctor > >> mrietveld > >> porcelli > >> pzapata > >> Rikkola > >> Salaboy > >> sotty > >> tsurdilo > >> > >> *Might keep commits right on the blessed repositories* > >> I 'll ask these people what they prefer and do that. > >> > >> esteban-aliverti > >> triceo > >> zenix > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
