On 21/02/2013, Geoffrey De Smet <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it break backwards compatibility when changed?
How should I know? - If the property is set using the public static final, then it's invariant under change. -W > > Op 21-02-13 15:49, Wolfgang Laun schreef: >> After a period of more than 24 hours, this point is still open, and >> the question of adding or not adding the dot leaves me in a tight >> spot. >> -W >> >> On 20/02/2013, Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Looking at >>> >>> WorkItemHandlerOption implements MultiValueKnowledgeSessionOption >>> >>> contains >>> >>> public static final String PROPERTY_NAME = "drools.workItemHandlers"; >>> >>> which is used as >>> >>> public String getPropertyName() { >>> return PROPERTY_NAME+name; >>> } >>> >>> so that some actual property setting would have to be the ugly >>> concatenation >>> >>> drools.workItemHandlerstheName = theHandler >>> >>> All (!) other multi-valued options use a period to separate the fixed >>> part from the user-defined tag, i.e., >>> >>> public static final String PROPERTY_NAME = "drools.workItemHandlers."; >>> >>> -W >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
