@Wolfgang
1. I think, it is a common sense. When I write here drool, everyone can
understand that it is drools. There is no drool, which make confusion.
2. thanks, I will post my issue there
3. you are right but i was not aware about the userlist. thanks for information
4. for me, it definitely make sense w.r.t. reusability and easy to use.
Regards,
Nasir
--- Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]> schrieb am Do, 11.4.2013:
Von: Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor split-up
An: "Rules Dev List" <[email protected]>
Datum: Donnerstag, 11. April, 2013 00:23 Uhr
@Nasir,
(1) Even being very new, you might have noted that this rule based system is
called "Drools", not "drool".
(2) You have used the list for Drools developers. Use the rules Users list:
[email protected].
(3) You have hijacked a thread discussing something not related to your
problem. Don't do that.
(4) I may be mistaken but I don't think that what you have written doesn't make
any sense, at least it doesn't to me. Make sure to get the basic vocabulary
right.
-W
On 10 April 2013 20:50, Nasir Ali <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear All,I am new to use drool. Since I have a large number of packages, is
there any Way that I Upload
facts on One Place (e.g. Global area) and Share it in all packages.
I shall be thankful for your help.
Best Regards,Nasir
Sent from my iPad
On 10.04.2013, at 20:24, Alexandre Porcelli <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 for IWB
On Apr 10, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Mark Proctor <[email protected]> wrote:
Did we decided on an extension, instead of IDE?
Mark
On 10 Apr 2013, at 17:11, Michael Anstis <[email protected]> wrote:
I will be starting the split tomorrow.
On 2 April 2013 11:23, Mark Proctor <[email protected]> wrote:
studio might be a problem, like suite and platform, it might overlap with
something they prefer in the RHT product names.
We could have "workbench" instead of "work". That would still be under IWE.
Integrated Workbench Environment. Or we could drop the Enviornement and have
IWB - Integrated WorkBench.
Mostly I want to make sure we don't chose something that skewer people's
thinking that it's only suitable for a specific use case, hence my search for a
more generic term. Also that we find a suitably short acronym. This framework
can form the basis of a variety of use cases.
IDE - Integrated Development Environment
IWE - Integrated WorkBench Environment.
IWB - Integrated WorkBench
AWD - Advanced WorkBench
Mark
On 2 Apr 2013, at 10:05, Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm easy with "W" instead of "D". How about "Integrated Work Studio"
>> instead of "Environment"?
>>
>
> Seems to me that people have forgotten about the good old work bench.
> Too nutsy-and-boltsy for the brighter future?
>
> -W
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
-----Integrierter Anhang folgt-----
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
