There is no reason why it can't be done with OCL, and I often hear of
people writting OCL drivers. I imagine most developers choose a
proprietary language because they feel it empowers the paradigm further,
for instance our I believe our language has less repitition and more
expressability that OCL, which is made possible due to our specific use
case.
Mark
but more simply its not as natural a fir for a ru
Elena Ţibrea wrote:
Hi,
I've been recently reading an article about OCL where the authour
states he sees no major dificulties for adopting OCL as notation for
specifying the /activation condition/ that triggers the /action part/
of a reactive rule.
I wonder than why rule engines use proprietary rule languages and not
smth standardized like OCL?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
