OK, I just solved my own problem. My proxy had no package, since the jdk
based proxy is only in a package if it has at least 1 non public interface,
according to the javadoc.
The suspect code beginning on line 333 is:
String pkgName = cls.getPackage().getName();
if ( "org.drools.reteoo".equals( pkgName ) ||
"org.drools.base".equals(
pkgName ) ) {
// We don't shadow internal classes
this.shadowEnabled = false;
return;
}
The getPackage() method returns null. In this case, it would be good if
JBoss Rules handled the null and went on to shadow the object anyway, since
it is obviously not in the org.drools packages.
Now I'll continue trying to build a test case for my original problem.
Shall I enter a JIRA for this issue?
Thanks,
-Chris West
On 7/12/07, Chris West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to use objects that are generated as dynamic proxies (through
the java.lang.reflect.Proxy class) as facts in JBoss Rules 4.0 MR3. My
project was using CGLib to generate proxies, and they were working just fine
in 3.0.6. However, when I tried 4.0, the CGLib based proxies seemed to
have a final method that kept the proxies from being proxied as shadow
facts. So I rewrote my code to try to use JDK based proxies, and version
4.0 MR3 accepts them and apparently creates shadow facts, but now my rules
don't fire correctly.
So, in an attempt to create a simple program to illustrate the problem, I
ran into a different problem. The attached eclipse project illustrates this
problem.
The error is:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf.<init>(Rete.java:333)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete.assertObject(Rete.java:152)
at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase.assertObject(ReteooRuleBase.java
:190)
at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooWorkingMemory.doInsert(
ReteooWorkingMemory.java:70)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(
AbstractWorkingMemory.java:772)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert (
AbstractWorkingMemory.java:584)
at com.sample.DroolsTest.main(DroolsTest.java:42)
Has anyone successfully used JDK based dynamic proxies as facts?
Thanks,
-Chris West
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
