Yes, there are. I work (as external consultant) for a few of those, which I am not allowed to disclose here...
But: A decision pro/con Drools should be based upon YOUR specific criteria, not those of other enterprises, right?! In my experience, Drools is both stable and performant enough to be used in productive environment. We tested several deployment and architecture variants (esp. for batch processing), with <100 Rules and <10 facts for each data-row within our batches, but a few million rows. Worked out fine. We currently use 3.0.6, no major issues. regards, Gernot > > Is there any companies which used Drools successfully ? > Tell us more about your experiences, I need it to make decision > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Entreprise-using-Drools-with-success-tf4101493.html#a11663657 > Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > -- Dr. Gernot Starke Willi-Lauf Allee 43, D-50858 Köln Tel. +49 (0) 177 - 728 2570 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gernotstarke.de http://www.arc42.de _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
