Hi,
 I usually use decision tables without sequence. But there was a request Not to 
use priority and if there was a conflict then the rule on top should get 
priority.

I thought, sequence = true was a good way of ensuring that. But in the rules I 
call update(); this forces all the rules to fire twice.

I think this is a bug; without sequence the update does not cause such problems.

Please advise,
Arjun

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply via email to