Hi, I usually use decision tables without sequence. But there was a request Not to use priority and if there was a conflict then the rule on top should get priority.
I thought, sequence = true was a good way of ensuring that. But in the rules I call update(); this forces all the rules to fire twice. I think this is a bug; without sequence the update does not cause such problems. Please advise, Arjun _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users