I'm not sure, will have to think on it the api is stateless and uses a single execute method, I'm not sure where the startProcess fits into that.

Mark


Shahad Ahmed wrote:
Mark,
Thanks for the reply. Are there any plans to make this functionality available directly via the API, rather than having to add a "dummy" rule into a rulebase in order to get workflow to work with stateless sessions? I can see how to make the change myself to ReteooStatelessSession by adding a setRuleFlow method that sets a private processId instance that all the execute methods can start if set (I guess an unset method wouldn't be needed for stateless sessions). An alternative might be to add variants of the existing execute and executeWithResults that also takes a Ruleflow processid, but I think this would add too many variations of execute. I'll probably have to make this change to use drools with the current application I'm writing, as modifying the rules will not be an option - I'm happy to submit the changes if you think this is worthwhile. Shahad

On 8/10/07, *Mark Proctor* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    you would have to call drools.getWorkingMemory().startProcess(id)
    from inside of a consequence.

    Mark
    Shahad Ahmed wrote:
    Does anyone know if it's possible to use a ruleflow with a
    StatelessSession?
The current documentation and API seem to show examples with
    StatefullSessions i.e.:
statefullSession.startProcess(id);
    statefullSession.fireAllRules();
    etc...
However, there doesn't seem to be anything equivalent in the API
    for StatelessSesssion's. I'd really like to be able to use the
    new sequential mode (i.e. with a StatelessSession) and ruleflow.
Regards,
    Shahad
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    rules-users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

    _______________________________________________
    rules-users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply via email to