That is great news. I misunderstood the behavior of the "exists" and "not". I thought it would only fire once, period. It wasn't a problem with our limitted test data, but I was thinking it would be a problem once we tested with large fact sets.
Thanks Edson! Edson Tirelli-3 wrote: > > Bryan, > > I'm not sure I completely understood your scenario, but Drools supports > FOL and your scenario can be implemented whatever it is. > > I think the best way is giving you some examples: > > rule "Fires FOR EACH fact that does not have a corresponding Exception > Range" > when > Fact1($number : number) > not ExceptionRange(startRange <= $number, stopRange >= $number) > then > // do something > end > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Existensial-not-question-tf4481066.html#a12782071 Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users