Well, I've downloaded the source, and it appears that it is occuring in the 
org.mvel.MVELRuntime class, method execute(). My equals token ("==") is being 
properly recognized, and converted to its integer representation (10). However, 
in a block with switch (operator), the org.mvel.Operator.EQUAL token does not 
appear, so the execute() method returns a null value because nothing is ever 
evaluated.

I've even verified that null is being returned from the execute method.

I stepped back out to the line (in org.mvel.CompiledExpression,java)
return handleParserEgress(execute(false, this, staticContext, factory), 
returnBigDecimal);

and then stepped into handleParserEgress and the first parameter, which is the 
return value from execute() is null!

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Jason


-----------


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 2:28 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Interesting null pointer exception when inserting 
afact.


Jason Partyka wrote:
It looks like the bug is still in there.

I am attempting to resolve it myself, but in order to do so I need to go into 
the MVEL code, but the mvel jar that is included as part of the drools 
classpath container (within eclipse) is just mvel14.jar. So I'm not sure where 
the source is or what version of MVEL source I should be attaching. I realize 
that the source-location thing is just an Eclipse issue, but I thought I'd let 
you know right away that it looks like it's still there.
We strip jar version numbers to make deployment with Eclipse easier. If you 
look at parent pom.xml it will tell you the version of MVEL used.


Anywhere you can point me to that would help with making sure I'm looking the 
right code.

Thanks,
Jason


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 8:17 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Interesting null pointer exception when inserting 
afact.


please check with 4.0.x, which will be in 4.0.5 this week, and let us know if 
this is fixed or not. But hurry we are releasing 4.0.5 very soon:
http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/branches/4.0.x/

Mark
Jason Partyka wrote:
I can give this a shot, but the reason why you suggest this is not obvious to 
me.

Have you encountered this problem yourself?

-Jason





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anstis, Michael (M.) 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 5:06 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: RE: [rules-users] Interesting null pointer exception when inserting 
afact.


I'm no expert but recall there can be problems running "long running" 
(subjective) code from AWT's worker thread.

I thought it was good practice to run your "application code" in a worker 
thread. This was the first google hit I had on the matter.

http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/vihavain/k03/Java/JavathreadsandGUI.html

Cheers,

Mike




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli
Sent: 08 March 2008 13:15
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Interesting null pointer exception when inserting 
afact.



   Jason,

   Can you please isolate and show us the rule that is creating the problem? It 
is happening either in a eval() statement or in a nested property access.

    []s
    Edson


2008/3/7, Jason Partyka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,

This is in relation to drools 4.0.4

I have an interesting problem. I am getting a null pointer exception when I am 
inserting a fact into a StatefulSession object. What is odd about this NPE is 
that, as far as I can tell (and I have inserted a breakpoint right before I 
insert the fact) that all the properties in the object are initialized, and 
there are no rules accessing any thing that could be null.

So here's my exception trace (just first few lines to get context):

Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException: 
java.lang.NullPointerException
  at org.drools.rule.EvalCondition.isAllowed(EvalCondition.java:76)
  at org.drools.reteoo.EvalConditionNode.assertTuple(EvalConditionNode.java:145)
  at 
org.drools.reteoo.SingleTupleSinkAdapter.createAndPropagateAssertTuple(SingleTupleSinkAdapter.java:55)
  at 
org.drools.reteoo.LeftInputAdapterNode.assertObject(LeftInputAdapterNode.java:116)
  at 
org.drools.reteoo.SingleObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(SingleObjectSinkAdapter.java:22)
  at org.drools.reteoo.ObjectTypeNode.assertObject(ObjectTypeNode.java:153)
  at org.drools.reteoo.Rete.assertObject(Rete.java:177)
  at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase.assertObject(ReteooRuleBase.java:192)
  at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooWorkingMemory.doInsert(ReteooWorkingMemory.java:71)
  at 
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:886)
  at 
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:858)
  at 
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:659)
  at com.hightower.drools.executablerules.Rules.setTemplate(Rules.java:112)
....
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
  at 
org.drools.base.mvel.MVELEvalExpression.evaluate(MVELEvalExpression.java:39)
  at org.drools.rule.EvalCondition.isAllowed(EvalCondition.java:72)
  ... 39 more


(that setTemplate method is not a drools template)

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Jason

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




--
  Edson Tirelli
  JBoss Drools Core Development
  Office: +55 11 3529-6000
  Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
  JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply via email to