2009/3/16 Edson Tirelli <tire...@post.com> > > This is an old discussion. Single binding on "or" is a non-orthogonal > special case on the language syntax that was introduced in the early days > when we only had "infix" CEs. When we started to support prefix CE, the > special case was not updated, and as a result, the single binding works only > with infix. >
The example I've posted is practically identical to Example 7.55, or with binding. So, if it's not in the language, it'd better not be in the documentation :-) As for the individual binding, as in (or $t : Trigger(fa == 1) $t : Trigger(fa == 2)) the documentation ought to caution against using different names, at least when these names are used on the RHS. I agree that or groups with bindings on patterns are tricky. But is the form that's now accepted by the compiler less error-prone than the one the compiler refuses? Wolfgang
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users