Leonardo Gomes wrote:
I think I missed something on that post. Just posted a reply.
Cheers,
Leo.
"In this scenario, aren't we moving logic that would be better expressed
in a declarative form (drl) to facts that are coded in java?"
That facts are coded in java is incidental there use is still very
declarative. Imperative is "how" and often procedural in nature. By
using the inferred fact the de-coupling makes sure it's not procedural,
the age policy rules do not invoke the card issuing rules. Secondly the
encapsulation and the abstraction makes sure the card issuing rules do
not know the "how" someone is an adult, they have just declaratively
been told that they are.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote:
Just published this, where I'm trying to explain good rule design in
terms more familiar to software developers.
http://blog.athico.com/2009/11/what-is-inference-and-how-does-it.html
Let me know what you think, and hopefully people have other ideas they
can add back in.
Mark
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
