Well, technically you choose a different dialect because you want different functionality, so consistency isn't a requirement. I do agree that the difference is not intuitive. I'm not sure why they're disabled in mvel. Dev d00ds? If the reason is just to enforce the "you shouldn't have conditions in the RHS" pattern then I don't think that's sufficient.
--- On Thu, 12/3/09, Barry Kaplan <grou...@memelet.com> wrote: > From: Barry Kaplan <grou...@memelet.com> > Subject: Re: [rules-users] Trivial rule with condition in RHS won't compile, > help please > To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org > Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 2:07 PM > > > Greg Barton wrote: > > > > You can use them in the RHS, but just with java > dialect. > > > > This is inconsistent. If they can be used in java, then > they should not be > disabled for mvel. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://n3.nabble.com/Trivial-rule-with-condition-in-RHS-won-t-compile-help-please-tp67458p67488.html > Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
