Barry, Any user registered evaluators should override the default ones, not the other way around. How are you registering your implementations?
Edson 2010/3/11 Barry Kaplan <grou...@memelet.com> > > As part of my drools-scala project I am implementing evalators for scala > collections. This means that the some default evaluator operators like > "contains" and "memberOf" need to be overridden. My problem is that drools > seems to load the evaluators as defined in meta-infa/(I forget the file > name) in an arbitrary manner. This results in my scala evaluator getting > registered and then the default evaluator getting registered, overriding > the > scala evaluator. > > Has this variant of extensibility been considered -- not adding evaluators > as that works great -- but overriding a drools implementation? If not, I'll > have to do some internals hacking. > > -bk > -- > View this message in context: > http://n3.nabble.com/Overriding-default-evaluators-tp441342p441342.html > Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
