That I don't know, sorry! Maybe have a look at the drools JIRA page, see if the issue has been discussed?
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, cwolfinger <chase.wolfin...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Yes. But the collection I am testing has Integer objects it is the object > of > the comparison for containment that is an int primitive. So my thoughts > are > if this would never work unless I use an eval then why does the rules > parser > allow the creation of condition that is invalid? > -- > View this message in context: > http://n3.nabble.com/Question-on-contains-operator-with-integer-tp440559p442221.html > Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- Enda J Diggins
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
