I added a comment to your jira entry. Please take a look. 2010/3/17 Amit Kumar <amitku...@gmail.com>
> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR-514 > Model is also there > > :) > > 2010/3/17 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.alive...@gmail.com> > > It would be good too if you could provide us your model (or at least a part >> of it). >> >> Best, >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikk...@redhat.com>wrote: >> >>> You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there. >>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR >>> >>> We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug. >>> >>> Toni >>> >>> Amit Kumar wrote: >>> > Sorry for spamming today >>> > It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or "All >>> > of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is >>> > there.. >>> > But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it >>> > permits me to assign a variable to it >>> > like Equipment(eId : entityId) >>> > but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning capability >>> > in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue. >>> > Thanks, >>> > Amit >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitku...@gmail.com >>> > <mailto:amitku...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Ok I tried again. :( >>> > >>> > In Equipment I only see manufacturer >>> > In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer >>> > In Software I do not see anything. >>> > >>> > It contains many more classes >>> > >>> > Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my >>> > model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post >>> > it on alias >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > Amit >>> > >>> > >>> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.alive...@gmail.com >>> > <mailto:esteban.alive...@gmail.com>> >>> > >>> > But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor? >>> > >>> > 2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitku...@gmail.com >>> > <mailto:amitku...@gmail.com>> >>> > >>> > Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that >>> > and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this >>> > issue sometime back with 5.0 >>> > Thanks >>> > Amit >>> > >>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar >>> > <amitku...@gmail.com <mailto:amitku...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Its coming from a JAR >>> > Thanks >>> > Amit >>> > >>> > Equipment >>> > entityId int >>> > partNumber String >>> > manufacturer String >>> > owningEntityId int >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Software >>> > entityId int >>> > OSType String >>> > OSVersion String >>> > imageName String >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > EquipmentCA extends Equipment >>> > hostname String >>> > productName String >>> > productFamily String >>> > productId String >>> > >>> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.alive...@gmail.com >>> > <mailto:esteban.alive...@gmail.com>> >>> > >>> > Are you importing your model from a .jar or using >>> > a Declarative Model? >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola >>> > <trikk...@redhat.com <mailto:trikk...@redhat.com>> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > Its possible that there are some bugs in the >>> > snapshots. Can you tell me >>> > what your model looks like? >>> > >>> > Toni >>> > >>> > Amit Kumar wrote: >>> > > The latest builds seem to be no good for >>> guvnor >>> > > They do seem rich in features .. especially >>> > support for >>> > > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with >>> > inbox and global packages. >>> > > >>> > > But But But.. on adding a fact in the >>> > when/then clause then all the >>> > > attributes of the facts are not coming .. >>> > some attributes come.. not >>> > > all of them. >>> > > I am picking it from here >>> > > >>> > >>> https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/ >>> > > Any other place I can look :) >>> > > >>> > > Thanks >>> > > Amit >>> > > >>> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar >>> > <amitku...@gmail.com <mailto: >>> amitku...@gmail.com> >>> > > <mailto:amitku...@gmail.com >>> > <mailto:amitku...@gmail.com>>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Thanks Jervis!! >>> > > >>> > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, >>> > Jervisliu <j...@redhat.com >>> > <mailto:j...@redhat.com> >>> > > <mailto:j...@redhat.com >>> > <mailto:j...@redhat.com>>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > A new feature called "Sharable >>> > artifacts/Global artifacts" will be >>> > > available in Drools 5.1. This >>> > feature allows you share an >>> > > asset among >>> > > different packages. It also creates >>> > a global area (you can >>> > > consider it >>> > > as a global package). Potentially >>> > you can promote an asset >>> > > that you >>> > > think is more appropriate to be >>> > defined in a global scope from >>> > > your >>> > > current package to the global area, >>> > so that this global asset >>> > > can be >>> > > reused by every package. This >>> > feature is already on trunk, >>> > > maybe you >>> > > want to give it a try. Any comments >>> > or feedbacks will be highly >>> > > appreciated. >>> > > >>> > > Cheers, >>> > > Jervis >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Amit Kumar wrote: >>> > > > Hello All, >>> > > > >>> > > > I am looking to organize the rules >>> > in different categories. >>> > > But for >>> > > > distribution purposes We are >>> > creating packages for different >>> > > > roles/processing phases >>> > > > >>> > > > So a rule will reside in one >>> > pckage but for navigation it >>> > > can belong >>> > > > to multiple categories >>> > > > >>> > > > So packages are like Shirts, >>> > Pants, Shoes, Sweaters >>> > > > Categories are Color, Material, >>> > Size, Gender and those have sub >>> > > > categories witin them >>> > > > >>> > > > We have rules which will device >>> > the category of the item >>> > > > Like "red rule", "blue rule", >>> > "cloth rule", leather rule" >>> > > > >>> > > > Now the problem we are facing is >>> > for category rules is if I >>> > > define the >>> > > > rule in Shirt package .. then I >>> > will not be able ot use it >>> > > in Pant >>> > > > package.. Will have to redefine it. >>> > > > >>> > > > The other problem in this scenario >>> > is If I have a price rule >>> > > in Shirt >>> > > > package and the category is "Blue >>> > Color" and "XL Size" then >>> > > I will >>> > > > have to put it in both categories >>> > > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on >>> > "Blue Category" and "XL Rule" >>> > > on "XL >>> > > > Category" and I put the rule in >>> > both categories.. will it >>> > > be an "and" >>> > > > relationship or will be an "OR" >>> > > > >>> > > > Regards, >>> > > > Amit >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > > > rules-users mailing list >>> > > > rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>> >>> > > > >>> > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > > rules-users mailing list >>> > > rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>> >>> > > >>> > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> > > rules-users mailing list >>> > > rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>> > > >>> > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > rules-users mailing list >>> > rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>> > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >>> > >>> > Esteban Aliverti >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > rules-users mailing list >>> > rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>> > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > rules-users mailing list >>> > rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >>> > >>> > Esteban Aliverti >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > rules-users mailing list >>> > rules-users@lists.jboss.org <mailto: >>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > rules-users mailing list >>> > rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >> >> Esteban Aliverti >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > -- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Esteban Aliverti
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users