There is MinaTaskClient and BaseTaskClient, but no TaskClient interface.
That is why:
public void start( long taskId, String userId,
TaskOperationResponseHandler responseHandler )
public void stop( long taskId, String userId,
TaskOperationResponseHandler responseHandler )
public void release( long taskId, String userId,
TaskOperationResponseHandler responseHandler )
public void suspend( long taskId, String userId,
TaskOperationResponseHandler responseHandler )
public void resume( long taskId, String userId,
TaskOperationResponseHandler responseHandler )
public void skip( long taskId, String userId,
TaskOperationResponseHandler responseHandler )
public void delegate( long taskId, String userId, String
targetUserId,
TaskOperationResponseHandler responseHandler )
public void complete( long taskId, String userId, ContentData
outputData,
TaskOperationResponseHandler responseHandler )
...
is not a reusable approach (to get rid of Mina, and use something else [
JMS, DB, etc.. ] ). I think it would make sense to create an interface
defining the contract, and program to that interface.
Am I missing something?
Thank you,
/Anatoly
P.S. I know the whole approach is going to change to be pluggable in the
near future, but I find it strange there is no contract/interface that
defines a task lifecycle.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Good-To-Have-TaskClient-Interface-tp768836p768836.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
