Thanks for your confirmation. Can anyone else report a case like that? I didn't progress much in finding an explanation so far. If anyone else could confirm, maybe this is some kind of common problem, maybe even a bug?
Is there something like a public issue tracker? Still, more cases would help, don't want to bug developers offering such a great project and in the end it turns out that I made a mistake... Have a nice weekend everyone! -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] Im Auftrag von mardo Gesendet: Freitag, 13. August 2010 14:46 An: rules-users@lists.jboss.org Betreff: Re: [rules-users] fireUntilHalt() and OSGi - CPU load "When invoking fireUntilHalt() for my StatefulKnowledgeSession, CPU load rises to 25% (meaning one complete core on the quad-core machine)." I can confirm this issue. Below is a minimal example. I have noticed that in DefaultAgenda, missedNotifyAll is always true in this case, is this an intended behaviour? <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <definitions id="Definition" targetNamespace="http://www.jboss.org/drools"; typeLanguage="http://www.java.com/javaTypes"; expressionLanguage="http://www.mvel.org/2.0"; xmlns="http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/20100524/MODEL"; xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xs:schemaLocation="http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/20100524/MODEL BPMN20.xsd" xmlns:g="http://www.jboss.org/drools/flow/gpd"; xmlns:tns="http://www.jboss.org/drools";> <process processType="Private" isExecutable="true" id="servicerequest2" name="servicerequest.b" > <!-- nodes --> <startEvent id="_1" name="Manual Trigger (Customer Calls)" g:x="19" g:y="124" g:width="48" g:height="48" /> <endEvent id="_19" name="End" g:x="463" g:y="148" g:width="48" g:height="48" > <terminateEventDefinition/> </endEvent> <userTask id="_22" name="Initialize Service Request Process" g:x="139" g:y="234" g:width="100" g:height="48" > <potentialOwner> <resourceAssignmentExpression> <formalExpression>john</formalExpression> </resourceAssignmentExpression> </potentialOwner> </userTask> <!-- connections --> <sequenceFlow id="_22-_19" sourceRef="_22" targetRef="_19" /> <sequenceFlow id="_1-_22" sourceRef="_1" targetRef="_22" /> </process> </definitions> public void test() throws InterruptedException{ try { // load up the knowledge base KnowledgeBase kbase = readKnowledgeBase(); final StatefulKnowledgeSession ksession = kbase.newStatefulKnowledgeSession(); WSHumanTaskHandler wsh = new WSHumanTaskHandler(); wsh.setConnection("127.0.0.1", 9123); ksession.getWorkItemManager().registerWorkItemHandler("Human Task", wsh); new Thread(new Runnable() { public void run() { ksession.fireUntilHalt(); } }).start(); ksession.startProcess("servicerequest2"); } catch (Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(); } Thread.sleep(1200000); } private static KnowledgeBase readKnowledgeBase() throws Exception { KnowledgeBuilder kbuilder = KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder(); kbuilder.add(ResourceFactory.newClassPathResource("testcases/integrationuc/se rvicerequest.bpmn"), ResourceType.BPMN2); return kbuilder.newKnowledgeBase(); } -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/fireUntilHalt-and-OSGi-CP U-load-tp1022352p1131701.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
