On 21/09/2010 19:44, Bernd Rücker wrote: > Hey! > > If you asked for "just" a rule engine, this is nothing available in jBPM > (which is a process engine). > > If you asked for processes and workflow then I have a follow up question > for Mark: Is there already any timeline on jBPM 5? Sometime next year :) There should be minimal api changes from what we have now on drools flow, just a bit more separation and modularity on the backend code.
Mark > Cheers > Bernd > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Mark Proctor > Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. September 2010 19:52 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [rules-users] drools vs jbpm > > On 21/09/2010 18:07, [email protected] wrote: >> Hi, >> We need a rules engine for our project and I am trying to determine the > main >> differences between Drools and JBPM. Can anyone on here provide a brief >> explanation maybe offering why one is better than the other, chances of > them >> being merged or one being retired over the other? Are they competing > projects? > Drools Flow will be incorporated into jBPM5. The safest bet for now is > to adopt Drools Flow, as the changes for adoptiong jBPM5 when we release > it will be minimal. > > Mark >> thanks! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
