Having just looked in the Drools JIRA repository, I pretty sure that it
is the same issue as was reported in JBRULES-2140
<https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2140>.
That entry has a repro.
I am interested as to what you mean by "right around the corner"?
Here is a repro anyway...
<QUOTE>
package rulestest
global java.util.logging.Logger logger
declare QuestionValidation
question: String
mandatory: Boolean
state: String
type: String
end
function void testfunc() {
System.out.println("testfunc called");
}
rule 'init'
dialect "mvel"
when
eval(true)
then
QuestionValidation qv = new QuestionValidation();
qv.setState("ss");
qv.setQuestion("qq");
insert(qv);
logger.info("Hello world");
end
rule 'test'
dialect "mvel"
when
$qv: QuestionValidation()
then
logger.info("Found a qv " + $qv);
end
</QUOTE>
If the testfunc is present then the "test" rule never fires. If it is
not present then the "test" rule fires just fine.
Chris
On 01/12/2010 21:47, Tihomir Surdilovic wrote:
Hi Chris, could you attach the repository export xml from your repo
that I can use to reproduce the issue with? BRMS 5.1 (supported bits)
is right around the corner and I would be able to tell you if the
issue still persists with the currently tested bits for 5.1.
Thanks.
Tihomir
On 12/1/10 4:29 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote:
Having spent all day on this one, I have finally got to the bottom of it.
The problem is reproducible if I have /both/ a declarative fact model
/and/ a function in my rules.
It doesn't matter whether the function is called or not... It's
presence is enough to cause the problem.
Any rule that is dependent on the existence of an instance of the
declarative fact model where the instance is created in the RHS of
another rule will not fire.
I suspect that this is a bug that has been fixed in 5.1 because I
have been using this technique in Drools 5.1... It's only since
downgrading to the (supported) JBoss Rules 5.0 that I have
experienced the problem.
Does anyone know if there is a fix in the 5.0 branch?
If I create a "real" Java class and upload it in a jar file to the
Guvnor and use that in place of the declarative model then the
problem does not happen.
This is a workaround in the short term but I would much prefer not to
have to do this.
Chris Selwyn
On 01/12/2010 15:14, Chris Selwyn wrote:
Yes the package is "SWWB2BOutgoing" but it looks as though the
package name simple doesn't get reported in the log file.
I have been debugging through this thing and where I've got to so
far is that I am getting two (and maybe more) entries for the class
"SWWB2BOutgoing.QuestionValidation" in the
ObjectTypeConfigurationRepository.
So my current question is "How is this possible?" Is it maybe a
classloader issue?
Chris
On 01/12/2010 12:05, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
A closer look:
On 1 December 2010 11:13, Chris Selwyn <ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk
<mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk>> wrote:
I can see the facts being inserted in the log as follows
[#|2010-12-01T09:19:16.723+0000|INFO|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.stream.out|_ThreadID=70;_ThreadName=p:
thread-pool-1; w: 7;|
OBJECT ASSERTED value:QuestionValidation( mandatory=true,
state=Closed,
question=B2B_METER_SERIAL_NUMBER, type=string ) factId: 39|#]
Shouldn't the package name appear in the log as well?
However, if I insert a QuestionValidation fact created in Java
by using
kbase.getFactType("SWWB2BOutgoing", "QuestionValidation") then
the Test
rule gets fired just fine.
That is, apparently "SWWB2BOutgoing".
-W
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3291 - Release Date: 12/01/10
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
