Hi Gurvinder, I've just taken a look at chapter 5.1 of Drools Expert about decision tables but I've been unable to find out how to do that. If you find a solution, could you please post it here? I'm pretty sure I will need that as well ;-). Best regards,
Bruno. groovenarula a écrit : > Thanks for the options, Bruno and Wolfgang. > > But is there a more 'generic' way to do the matches ? The problem I have is > that the # of instances that might match could vary. And I have to provide a > means for the business users to be able to provide that 'option's code' > using a decision table. Basically I need to be able to provide a construct > that's would look something like : > > Options > "P1,P2" > "P1,P4,P5" > > So in the above decision table had 2 rules where in the first row represents > a rule that matches against Options with Codes P1 and P2. And the second > rule would match against options with codes P1, P4 and P5. > > Is it possible to represent this using Drools decision tables ? > > Thanks > Gurvinder > > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users