On 9 March 2011 13:07, groovenarula <gnaru...@la-z-boy.com> wrote: > > XXX YYY "one,two,three" > > where XXX, YYY will be in 2 individual cells that will hold the values for > one fact, and the "one,two,three" will be in a third cell will from which I > need to create separate instances for each value of fact #2. > > I'm trying to see if there's a way to use the current spreadsheet without > changing it drastically. That will make the solution a lot more acceptable. > > Looks like reading the cells and generating Java code to insert the facts is the cheapest solution. I see no point in constructing rules just to get some facts into WM.
> W - Can you please elaborate on your last statement : > > It's doable from a spreadsheet, using the "forall" substitution. > > If I'm not mistake that's what I would use if it's a decision table - Would > I be able to use 'forall' even if I'm using a template to insert the facts > ? > Yes, I was referring to decision tables. No, that "forall" is done by the DT parser/expander. -W
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
