Op 10-03-11 09:27, Ansgar Konermann schreef: > Hi Geoffrey, > > On 10.03.2011 08:58, Geoffrey De Smet wrote: >> There's a jira for a maven-drools-plugin with possible requirements >> and I believe there already 2 implementations in the wild. >> >> IMHO: >> 1) It should be centralized into the droolsjbpm-tools repository. >> Make a pull request on that repository and I 'll peer review it. >> > It's ASL licensed - if you feel like it, fork it, pull it, do whatever > you like under this license. My team and I needed a starting point and > we found it too complicated to work with the drools source code > repository during the last few months/weeks. Understandable. The big changes are done, so the drools source code repository should be stable any day now :) Watch the lights on hudson: https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/Drools%20jBPM/ >> 2) The goals etc should follow maven naming conventions. >> 3) There should be integration tests. >> 4) It should use the latest maven 3 best practices. >> >> In short: it's best to start from a really good, existing, up-to-date, >> ASL-licensed other maven plugin that does non-java compiling. >> > Is this just a write-down of your thoughts with no relation to the > implementation described on the given web page, or should it actually > referr to the given implementation? Just a quick write down of my thoughts, I haven't had the change to check your implementation yet. Sorry for the confusion.
Afaik, from maven 2 to maven 3, a lot of the plugin infrastructure has been deprecated and replaced by new API's (aether, it testing, ...), so I was wondering if the plugin takes advantage of those things (if appropriate). > If it should be the latter, could you be a bit more concrete (except for > maybe point 1)? Admitted, I'm new to maven plugin development, but I > tried hard and thus can't see where points 2 to 4 are violated. If there > are any points to be improved, I'd be glad to fix them, given some > pointers to relevant information and a ticket in the bug tracker (also > linked from the web page). > > Best regards > > Ansgar >> Op 09-03-11 22:42, Mauricio Salatino schreef: >> >>> I will take a look on that right now.. >>> I was planning to do the same for some of my example projects. >>> I will come back with some feedback! >>> Greetings. >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ansgar Konermann >>> <ansgar.konerm...@googlemail.com >>> <mailto:ansgar.konerm...@googlemail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I prepared a tiny drools compiler plugin for Maven 3. It currently >>> contains the smallest feature-set which is potentially useful for my >>> colleagues at work, so up to now it's no more than a starting >>> point for >>> my team. Nevertheless, I invite you to take a look at it, comment >>> on it >>> and suggest features _you_ would like to see in the plugin in one >>> of its >>> future releases. >>> >>> There's some inital documentation here: >>> http://passion.forco.de/content/maven-drools-plugin >>> >>> Looking forward to your comments. >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Ansgar >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com >>> - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com >>> - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar >>> >>> - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio - >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- With kind regards, Geoffrey De Smet _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users