Greg, I will look into that. Trunk is under heavy work right now, so it will probably not work.
Edson 2011/3/17 Greg Barton <greg_bar...@yahoo.com> > Yes, but I just fired up a small project using it and it used 100% of CPU. > If you build the attached project you'll see the tests run just fine. (They > use fireAllRules.) If you launch from the commandline, ("java -jar > target/DroolsBoxes-1.0.jar") which uses fireUntilHalt, the rules fire (and > complete) just fine, but it continues to use 100% of a cpu core > indefinitely. This is with 5.1.1. If I change the drools version to > 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT it compiles but the tests won't run. They all fail with the > following exception: > > java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > org.drools.spi.DeclarationScopeResolver.<init>([Ljava/util/Map;Ljava/util/Stack;)V > at > org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuildContext.<init>(RuleBuildContext.java:72) > at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:1198) > at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:629) > at > org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java:278) > at > org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder.java:451) > at > org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.java:28) > at com.sample.DroolsTest.readKnowledgeBase(DroolsTest.java:75) > at com.sample.DroolsTest.go(DroolsTest.java:31) > at com.sample.BoxTest.test0(BoxTest.java:21) > > --- On *Thu, 3/17/11, Edson Tirelli <ed.tire...@gmail.com>* wrote: > > > From: Edson Tirelli <ed.tire...@gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires > To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 10:47 AM > > > > To be honest, I believe so, but didn't profiled it extensively. I used > fireUntilHalt() in my Webinar yesterday on a live demo and it worked nicely. > > Edson > > 2011/3/17 Greg Barton > <greg_bar...@yahoo.com<http://mc/compose?to=greg_bar...@yahoo.com> > > > > > Has the performance problem with fireUntilHalt been fixed in 5.2? > > --- On *Thu, 3/17/11, Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça < > vitor.mendo...@brisa.pt <http://mc/compose?to=vitor.mendo...@brisa.pt>>*wrote: > > > From: Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça > <vitor.mendo...@brisa.pt<http://mc/compose?to=vitor.mendo...@brisa.pt> > > > > Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires > To: "'Rules Users List'" > <rules-users@lists.jboss.org<http://mc/compose?to=rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > > > Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 7:01 AM > > > Hi Thomas, thanks for the info! > > > > I googled it quite a bit and I think it’s a path to be explored, albeit > I’ve saw several messages on the mailing list regarding performance issues > when using fireUntilHalt. > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org<http://mc/compose?to=rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > -- > Edson Tirelli > JBoss Drools Core Development > JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org<http://mc/compose?to=rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users