Nothing out-of-the-box AFAIK, but a patch (or better yet a pull request) is welcome.
Just wrapping both ends in ZipOutputstream and ZipInputstream should do the trick, but then we'd have always zipping, but we might want it optional. If we want optional zipping, the client should include a header/argument to the server to ask it in zip format (similar like the HTTP protocol) and the server should always support both (just do what the client asks him to do). That we we don't rely in the client and server having to be configured the same and crashing wierdly if they aren't. Op 01-07-11 16:42, tarley.lana schreef: > Ok, but I have to modify the class org.drools.agent.impl.KnowledgeAgentImpl > for it to do unzip the package on the client. There is no standard mechanism > for this? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-there-any-way-to-compress-gzip-the-rules-package-to-optimize-network-traffic-between-server-and-a-tp3129297p3129523.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- With kind regards, Geoffrey De Smet _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
