2011/7/31 Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org>

>
>
> Implicit mapping I call Managed Object Graphs MOGs. So you can write
> Person( address.street == "my road" )
>
> And that internally would get translated too
> $p : Person()
> Address( person == $p, street == "my road" )
>
> As there is no doubt that the current explicit bindings approach on objects
> is too verbose and hard to read. Nested accessors add a lot of readability.
>
>
So what if Address is not an inserted fact? So far, a CE with type Foo(...)
implied the existence of a fact of that type. I'm not sure that inserting
some object should imply the insertion of all of its descendants as facts as
well...

-W
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply via email to