Edson: Thanks for the quick reply. I created these JIRA issues: F1: Duplicate job scheduling in org.drools.time.impl.DefaultTimerJobInstance.call() - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3284
F2: NullPointerException in org.drools.time.impl.DefaultTimerJobInstance.compareTo(DefaultTimerJobInstance) - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3285 F3: org.drools.time.TimerService.scheduleJob(Job, JobContext, Trigger) suddenly requires non-null JobContext - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3286 While you are working on the event scheduling system, you may also want to look at these two earlier bug reports for Drools 5.2.0: Long.MAX_VALUE duration for "A and not(B after A)" type rules causes invalid session clock time in rule RHS when running with pseudo clock - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3100 "A and not(B after A)" type rules don't fire when session clock has negative values (pre Unix epoch) - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3103 I have not checked their status in Drools 5.3.0, but the description should tell you whether they still apply. FWIW, among all of these, F2 (JBRULES-3285) has the highest priority (as it's breaking my unit tests), followed by F1 (JBRULES-3284). Thanks! Vincent: Yes, I think there is risk. Even if you don't use jobs explicitly, Drools uses the same event scheduling system for both internal events and application-defined events and jobs. The main problem is this: How do you establish correctness of your code and the overall system? Well, you make sure your unit tests and functional tests pass. As it stands, I cannot get my tests to pass with Drools 5.3.0, so I cannot put Drools 5.3.0 in production. No matter which version you use, only good test coverage will give you the assurance that your system is functioning properly. I encourage you to try out Drools 5.3.0 (in a test environment) and to report any issues you run into. It can only help make Drools better. 2011/11/9 Vincent LEGENDRE <vincent.legen...@eurodecision.com> > Just wondering : does these problems happends because you use clocks and > jobs, or is it general to fusion 5.3 ? > Did not migrate my project on 5.3 for now. > So do you think there is a risk, knowing that I only use very basic fusion > features ? > > ------------------------------ > *De: *"Edson Tirelli" <ed.tire...@gmail.com> > *À: *"Rules Users List" <rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > *Envoyé: *Mercredi 9 Novembre 2011 14:53:00 > *Objet: *Re: [rules-users] Bugs in Drools 5.3.0 break Fusion event > processing > > > > Richard, > > This is great info. Yes, please open JIRA's for all 3 issues and we > will make sure this is fixed for the next release. > > Thank you, > Edson >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users