I agree that I jumped in on an effort to define a requirement in terms of a solution ... however, people generally understand else and otherwise, so there is some justification in saying you want something to work like them.
I don't care what the underlying mechanism is, but as it stands now we have to write a rule "When (condition-A)" and then another rule "When not (condition-A)" ... and I think that makes the rules more difficult to understand and to maintain. Thanks Ron -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/else-in-rule-tp3264337p3564318.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
