It would probably be beneficial to include the tests you run; otherwise - if tuning is possible - it'd be difficult to know what to suggest.
Interestingly only test 9 appears slower whereas the others are up to x2 faster. I wouldn't consider this as mixed results. I also find it interesting how you automatically expect an improvement in performance with subsequent releases; rather than improvements in feature-set. On 21 March 2012 20:32, womuji <cmregis...@gmail.com> wrote: > We recently upgrade our Drools Expert from 5.1 to 5.3, expecting big > performance gain. But from the tests we done so far, the result is mixed at > best. Is this common or there is sth we can fine-tune the system? All > time is in milliseconds. Thanks > ------------------------------ > View this message in context: Performance gain by upgrading Drools Expert > from 5.1 to > 5.3<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Performance-gain-by-upgrading-Drools-Expert-from-5-1-to-5-3-tp3846747p3846747.html> > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list > archive<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-User-forum-f47000.html>at > Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
