And why do you talk about two accounts? Normally, you don't know much about the "foreign" account, except when it is an "in-house" transaction.
You'll have to redesign. The Account type you have now is not good for what you intend to do. It is a snapshot of an Account in a certain state, and therefore it creates a considerable overhead in your fact database. There are some mathematically wrong assumptions, too. For instance, you cannot compute a "balance averaged over 30 days" by taking the average of so many account updates. -W On 28/06/2012, chrisLi <[email protected]> wrote: > Oops! > > I did not retract these two accounts after the transaction has been > processed. I thought these two > > accounts may be used later. I attempted to update these two accounts with > session.update(facthandle, > > object) with assertbehaviour setting to equality. However, no rules were > fired. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Does-Drools-Fusion-consume-a-lot-of-memory-tp4018307p4018329.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
