Davide Sottara wrote > > If your rules are dynamic, would you still want to retract a fact not > matching any of your current rules, > knowing that a new rule might appear later, which would be activated by > that fact? >
That's a good question. Smaller memory footprint by retracting. But we lose the immediate activation of future rules. Maybe I'll make it an option and let somebody else decide. ;) Davide Sottara wrote > > For now I would suggest this: whenever you insert an object, you will get > back a FactHandle. > Cast it to org.drools.common.InternalFactHandle and look at > getFirstLeftTuple() and getFirstRightTuple(). > I haven't checked it completely, but I would say that if the fact does > not participate in any tuple, it > might be worthy retracting. > That's great info!! Worked like a charm. Once again, thanks guys! You've been extremely helpful. - Ladd -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-retract-events-that-don-t-match-any-rules-without-expires-tp4018760p4018765.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users