Hi, don't think so...
the JBPM project is under full activity... just look at the issue tracking: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPM. the version 5.4.0.CR1 was released some weeks ago (could see no notes about, but it was). 5.4.0.Final should be released soon and the team is already working in the 6.0 tickets... And if you pay attention in the issue tracking you will see that the JBPM tickets are integrated with the payed supported JBoss product. I'm using it myself in in some project. regards, Cristiano On 07/11/12 16:33, dunnlow wrote: > Hi, > > I am considering using drools with Flow/jBPM as an integral part of a > corporate solution. However, it seems to me like the project is dying on > the vine. I understand the code is still being worked but overall interest > seems to be waning; evidenced by things like, a (...the) jBPM 5 book due two > months ago is still MIA. No blog posts on the project for six weeks. > > I don't mean to bash jBPM, but am just worried about it's future. I suppose > the Flow/jBPM merge is irreversible? Any thoughts? > > Is anyone using another BPM system with drools? > > Thanks, > -J > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-Flow-jBPM-dying-on-the-vine-tp4020738.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
