Hi , I re ran the test using drools 5.4.0 too, same problem. In the majority of our cases Property Reactive Facts work really well. Not using this feature is not really an option that we would like to take as we would have to rewrite the rules. We have thousands of rules.
Can you please let me know the process for getting this bug fixed in drools? I would like to propagate this issue to the engineering team and for them to fix the bug in the next release. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/same-criteria-across-multiple-rules-cancels-activation-with-Property-Reactive-Facts-tp4021204p4021208.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
